NCDP Chair, David Parker, must resign now for the good of the party
Please sign the petition asking NCDP chair David Parker to resign.
Please sign the petition asking NCDP chair David Parker to resign.
Come take the poll. No registration required on the website http://democraticmuse.com
Thanks!
<p>After three and a half years in Washington trying to push legislation as a member standing independent from the different caucuses in Congress, Larry Kissell has decided it is time to have some allies. Today he called and told me he is joining the Blue Dogs. I wasn't that surprised.</p>
<p>Larry assured me his values have not changed. He remains pro-choice and will continue to vote with and for his constituents instead of special interests. He simply needed some allies to help push legislation through the House.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“I’ve always said I’m not much of a joiner, but I believe that a strong moderate presence is needed, and that’s why I have joined the Blue Dog Coalition,” said Rep. Larry Kissell, D-N.C. “Now, more than ever, we must have representatives who are willing to work with both sides of the aisle to get the job done, whether working to create jobs and get our economy back on track or get our fiscal house in order, and it is clear that our moderate message is strongest when we stand together.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Being in the minority has inherent challenges, but being in the minority and being unaligned with a power base makes getting anything accomplished next to impossible. I guess Larry just got tired of banging his head against a wall.</p>
<p>I respect Larry. I consider him a friend and I admit I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt. I can't walk in his shoes, but I imagine Washington is a lonely place when you are standing off on your own. Larry has a responsibility to get things accomplished for his district. Now he will have some help.</p>
Check out how much #Amendment1 proponents have raised so far. #FAIL @PamSpaulding @JoeSudbay @TylerJMcCall
There is amazing news today in the battle to defeat Amendment One. Todd and Diana Stiefel are offering a $100,000 matching fund to help get ads in opposition to the amendment on television. Please click here to defeat Amendment One.
The following is the beautiful and eloquent email the Stiefels wrote to announce the matching fund:
My name is Todd Stiefel. My wife, Diana, and I have a passionate belief that our country would be better off if we put people above politics. Families in North Carolina matter far more than a divisive constitutional amendment such as Amendment One, and that is why we are now offering a $1 for $1 match up to $100,000 to the campaign.
The campaign to defeat the amendment only has three more weeks to get out the word about the harms that North Carolina would face if Amendment One passes on May 8. That is why we are stepping up now to give to the campaign. We hope that you can join us.
Won’t you please take a few minutes to give a few dollars to help defeat Amendment One?
The momentum against Amendment One has grown substantially in recent weeks. Former GOP Gubernatorial nominee Richard Vinroot, Justice Bob Orr, John Hood and other conservatives have advocated against it in recent weeks. Governor Bev Perdue came out passionately against it last week in a powerful video, and the next morning Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers condemned the amendment as well.
But all of this momentum does not matter if the campaign does not have a fully funded television, radio and direct mail campaign. Will you donate $25, $50, $100, $250 or $500 today to make sure that the people of North Carolina hear the truth about the amendment? Diana and I will match every dollar that you give, doubling the impact of your gift, up to $100,000.
This campaign has been largely funded by people just like you. Now, in this critical stretch, we must step up once again.
Won’t you please step up now to help defeat Amendment One?
The ads that the campaign have produced are truly powerful. The message that they carry forth about the harms to children, families and unmarried women must be heard. While this amendment directly impacts gay and lesbian families, it is so poorly written that straight families, unmarried women, and children are collateral damage of this harmful amendment. This amendment does not help anyone; it only harms. Diana and I were so inspired by the message that we decided to step up and we hope that you will join us.
The campaign has offered to show the television ads first to anyone who donates to the campaign this week. They will go on the air soon and every dollar that you give this week will go directly to increasing the ad buy. It is fair to say that every dollar that you give will go directly towards defeating the amendment.
On May 8 we North Carolinians will decide if they want the state to treat people equally or if we want to write discrimination into the constitution of our state. We must choose to place people, especially children, above politics by voting against the amendment.
Please stand with the Stiefels and with all North Carolina families in defeating Amendment One.
No registration necessary to vote in polls
According to Stu Rothenberg, one of these candidates will replace Larry Kissell in Washington. Which one do you think will win?
In the past we’ve ripped Republicans for stacking their audiences with hand-picked crowds. We’ve seen town halls canceled so candidates can avoid angry confrontations with voters. The silliness continues with Eric Cantor canceling a speech at the famed Wharton School of Business because it was rumored that people from the “Occupy” movements would march to protest his speech.
Someone’s not ready for prime time.
“I think it’s a shame that a speech at a university should not occur because of some fear that there will be skeptics and critics in the audience,” said English professor Al Filreis, who signed a statement expressing solidarity for the Occupy Wall Street movement.
Filreis added, “Clearly, the reason he canceled was that he wanted to speak to a friendly audience, and not one that would ask him difficult questions.”
The Daily Pennsylvanian reports that the protesters did enter the building by force, but were welcome to be there and eventually left of their own accord. Cantor, on the other hand, never showed up.
His office says he thought the speech was private and only for students, staff and friends of Wharton. Cantor finds out the general population is allowed through the doors and cancels. He then blames it on Wharton for changing the attendance agreement. The only problem for Cantor is, according to the university, the attendance agreement was never changed.
In a little twist of irony, Cantor’s speech (full text linked) was to be on income inequality. The fact that he hid from the very people protesting income inequality in this country doesn’t say much about his passion for the topic or his commitment to 99% of Americans.
(Source: democraticmuse.com)